Archive for November, 2005

Cheating in Japan: An Architectural Affair

Friday, November 25th, 2005

Hmmmm… An Architect Cuts Corners, and Shakes Japan’s Faith

This is pretty disturbing. Japan has very frequent seismic activity (an opinion, perhaps), so it is almost certain that the buildings in question will suffer potential damage. That’s a pretty risky thing to cut corners on. I would imagine that the death of even one person would weigh heavily on the architect’s conscience (I would hope), let alone the deaths of potentially hundreds. It’s a little hard to believe that they didn’t consider that when they were skipping around the building codes trying to squeeze a few more Yen out of the deal…

icon_credo TAGS: | | |

China: Chemical Spills, Cover-ups & Earthquakes

Friday, November 25th, 2005

Given that in a few short months I will be traveling through various cities in China, I find the recent news of an attempted cover up of a chemical spill just a bit troubling, particularly due to the fact that the spill has affected the municipal water system. Oh yeah, and also because the government tried to cover it up.

I won’t be drinking the water while I’m there, thank you very much, but I think it is horrible that those whom this debacle is going to effect on a daily basis, are not afforded the same luxury of choice. I wonder how many people consumed some of the contaminated water before the truth was brought about? Does the government really think that such information suppression is appropriate ethically? I’m having a hard time understanding the logic of keeping this kind of a thing quiet…

icon_credo TAGS: | | |

CEO Compensation vs. The Rest of Society

Friday, November 25th, 2005

I came across a very interesting post today about CEO compensation that is well worth reading: Spencer Uresk’s blog

Spencer’s blog caught my attention because I was reading his more recent post about AJAX and related frameworks and then I was abruptly treated to a commentary on the increase in CEO compensation and how it contradicts the trend the rest of the world affords. Very interesting stuff.

icon_credo TAGS: | | |

Washington Post’s Business Ethics Section

Friday, November 25th, 2005

I’m amazed that I had not previously found this: Business: Corporate Ethics. It has been a while since I’ve read the Washington Post, though I now regret what I may have missed. I particularly like the company-specific sections (Adelphia, Enron, Tyco, etc.).

icon_credo TAGS: | | |

Dunkin’ Donuts Does Coffee

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2005

Dunkin' Donuts Does CoffeeI thought it only fitting that I would follow my last post with a mention of Brand Autopsy’s Lowest Common Denominator. It seems that the donut shop is trying to “McDonalds-inize” their coffee operations. Think Dunkin’ Donuts isn’t serious about making coffee their big thing? Check out their homepage (and don’t forget to give that logo a looksie one more time). Funny, I don’t see any donuts, just a bunch of coffee.

Dunkin' Donuts homepage

(Screen shot for posterity — I’m sure the homepage will look different in a few weeks…)

icon_credo TAGS: | | | |

Starbucks Challenge, Part Deux

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2005

Starbucks Challenge and Fair TradeThis past weekend, I had an encounter at an independent coffee shop that has unfortunately sprouted a new batch of questions about Starbucks and their Fair Trade claims. During a short visit to Santa Barbara, my wife and I were holed up at Finestra Cafe for a slew of meetings (it’s our favorite “remote” office when we are in Santa Barbara — free WiFi, excellent coffee [FT+], the best baked goods around, and a great atmosphere), soaking up the java and having a great time.

During one of my return trips to the counter to top off our mugs, I struck up a conversation about Fair Trade Coffee with the cashier. I knew all of their beans were Fair Trade, and mentioned that they should make it more obvious — there aren’t any signs, labels or slight innuendoes that their beans are ethical. I only knew because I had asked during a previous visit, and I was convinced that other patrons might like to know as well.

As all conversations about coffee shops and Fair Trade seem to go lately (at least for me), we ended up steering the conversation toward Starbucks and the Starbucks Challenge. I made some crack about the bag of FT beans they keep stashed in the back of the storeroom, thinking I was being funny, but quickly lost my sense of humor. It turns out that the cashier had previously been an employee of Starbucks and had some insight regarding my sarcastic quaff. He made some lavish claim about how all of Starbucks coffee is actually Fair Trade…and then proceed to mutter about how odd Howard Schultz is as a person. I was a bit taken aback, but resigned myself to thinking that this individual, while pleasant and well-intentioned, probably had no idea what he was talking about.

So I thought…

Yesterday evening, I took my case to a friend who happens to be a manager at Starbucks. Still skeptical about the claims, I nonetheless wanted to hear the truth. Sure enough, all of Starbucks beans are Fair Trade-ish, depending on how loose of a definition you want to use. The main point she stressed is that all of the beans they purchase are procured at price that is essentially a Fair Trade rate for that producer. The kicker is that they are only NOT Fair Trade beans because the producer has not taken the steps to become a certified FT producer. My friend mentioned that the certification process is expensive, and were all of the producers that Starbucks buys from certified, they could actually claim that all of their beans afford the Fair Trade moniker.

Hmm.

So I’ve been chewing on this all night and into the morning and understandably have a few things bouncing around my mind. While I am fairly cautious of large corporations, I also think it is important to know the truth, and then proceed accordingly:

  1. If these claims are true (one former, and one existing Starbucks’ employee) why have we not seen more about this side of the story yet? Is it out there but just not as readily available?
  2. Let’s assume they are true — is the Challenge then about pointing out how poorly trained Starbucks employees are to handle the Fair Trade issue?
  3. And if Starbucks cares enough to spend the extra money on the beans, even though they can’t claim that they are truly Fair Trade, why not pony up the extra cash and help these producers receive their certification? (Perhaps they can use some of the $millions that are left over from Ethos sales past the $10 million mark, eh?)

Here’s a portion from Starbucks’ policy titled “Starbucks, Fair Trade, and Coffee Social Responsibility[PDF] to consider:

“Starbucks is committed to paying fair prices for all of our coffee. We do that to ensure that farmers make a profit and to encourage future production of high quality coffee. Starbucks pays premium prices that are substantially over and above the prevailing commodity-grade coffee prices. In fiscal 2003, when prices for commercial-grade arabica coffee ranged from $0.55-$0.70 per pound, Starbucks paid an average of $1.20 per pound for all of our coffee.

“Fair Trade Certified coffee is one part of a larger effort by Starbucks to be socially responsible in our relationships with coffee farmers and communities Fair Trade certification is limited to small-scale farmers organized in cooperatives, and currently represents less than 3% of the world’s coffee farmers. Because of our size and quality requirements, Starbucks buys coffee from small, medium, and large scale farms. We pay premium prices for all coffee. We use coffee purchasing guidelines, called C.A.F.E. Practices, which give preference to farmers who score high in measurements of economic fairness, socially responsible working conditions, and progressive environmental practices.

“Starbucks provides financing that helps coffee farmers invest in their farms and hold their beans for sale at times of favorable market prices. This year alone, Starbucks provided $1 million for financing through the Calvert Foundation, giving 10,000 Fair Trade coffee farmers access to affordable credit. In addition, Starbucks provided another $2.5 million to Conservation International’s Verde Ventures, making similar financing available to additional farmers in Central and South America.”

Okay. Now check out Starbucks: Fairly Deceptive Claims.

This is a complicated scenario and it is difficult to know what the real truth is without doing some detailed hands-on research. Nonetheless, it is very important to talk about and explore as the implications, one way or another, are pretty substantial.

icon_credo TAGS: | | | | | |

WSJ Compiles Drucker’s Opinion Pieces

Saturday, November 19th, 2005

There have been a flurry of articles and tributes to the late Peter Drucker, but I hadn’t heard of the Wall Street Journal’s collection of his opinion pieces until now (from Business Pundit). The breadth of the writings is a bit overwhelming though I am glad for this second opportunity to be able to read each of them. Here are two of my favorites:

icon_credo TAGS: | | |
|

Kauffman eVenturing

Friday, November 18th, 2005

The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation recently opened a new site called eVenturing. The site looks like it is packed to the brim with information and will most certainly be a resource I use regularly:

“Geared to those who are building companies that innovate and create jobs and wealth, Kauffman eVenturing is the trusted guide for entrepreneurs on the path to high growth. The site provides original articles, written by entrepreneurs for entrepreneurs, and aggregates “the best of the best” content on the Web related to starting and running high-impact companies.

“Entrepreneurs will find eVenturing to be an interactive, vibrant, and vital place to make important connections, access help and advice, and find relevant, practical “just-in-time” information and tools.”

Thanks to The Entreprenurial Mind for their post which introduced me to the site.

icon_credo TAGS: | | | |

Gov. Schwarzenegger & China

Friday, November 18th, 2005

Check out siliconbeat.com’s post, “Schwarzenegger’s trip to China a sham?” for an interesting look at the Governor’s efforts in China as well as some interesting debate about his intentions.

icon_credo TAGS: | | | |

“Global Reach” Follow-Up

Friday, November 18th, 2005

I was reading Thom Singer’s blog and found a comment that nicely reflects the dynamic I was trying to point out in my last post. Here’s a small portion of Singer’s post (the rest can be found here):

“The men and women in line appear to come from every ethnic and economic background, yet they are all bonded together by the fact that they are spending on coffee an amount of money that could feed a family for days in a third world country.”

Gee, I wonder what coffee shop he is talking about…

icon_credo TAGS: | | | |